In Help Save Maryland News – Pro Amnesty Congresswoman, Donna Edwards from Maryland – Also, Black Group called “Klan”


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Help Save Maryland Newsletter

EXCELLENT OPPORTUNITY TO ASK EDWARDS WHY SHE IS A SPONSOR OF THE AMNESTY LEGISLATION DRAFTED BY THE RADICAL HISPANIC CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS
 
 
Subject: Donna Edwards Town Hall meeting in Germantown tomorrow morning

On Saturday, April 17, 2010 Congresswoman Donna F. Edwards will host a town hall meeting to discuss issues and policies with constituents of Maryland’s 4th Congressional District.

 
When:          Saturday, April 17, 2010
 
Time:           10:30am – 12:00pm
 
Where:        Lake Seneca Elementary School
                   13600 Wanegarden Drive
                   Germantown, MD 20874

 
 
LEO ALEXANDER PARTICIPATED IN THE PEOPLE FOR CHANGE/HELP SAVE MARYLAND IMMIGRATION EVENT IN PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY.  HE IS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE IMPACT OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION ON THE BLACK COMMUNITY.
 
LEO STRONGLY SUPPORTS THE FEDERAL E-VERIFY PROGRAM, WHICH SCREENS OUT ILLEGAL ALIENS FROM THE WORKFORCE, AS A WAY TO IMPROVE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITES FOR BLACK WORKERS IN DC.
 
Brad Botwin, Director, Help Save Maryland  240-447-1884
 
 
You are cordially invited to a reception
         to meet and support
 
              Leo Alexander
 
Candidate for Mayor of the District of Columbia on
 
 Tuesday, April 27, 2010
 
     6:30 pm –  9:30 pm
 
        at the home of Mrs. Joan Hueter
       located at:
 
        1600 South Eads Street, Apartment 723 North
         Arlington, VA 22202
 
             Located near Crystal City Metro Station 
             Paid parking available at the Marriott Hotel
            
 
Click the links below to hear more about Leo Alexander’s stance on immigration and worksite enforcement:
 
YouTube – Anti-Amnesty Black Group Called ‘Klan’ 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45Fy3MVivLs
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYY1jSyT_j8&feature=
 

 
LETTER TO EDITOR
 
In the March issue of the Takoma Voice Ms. Dvera Saxton attempts to defend the City’s quarter-century-old Sanctuary Law (“Proud to live in a Sanctuary City”).  I also was a strong supporter of the law when it initially was proposed, and advocated for it before our City Council.  But it isn’t 1985, and circumstances on the illegal immigration front have changed substantially in the past 25 years.  Illegal aliens are no longer flocking to our country to escape oppressive political regimes. 
 
They are entering our country for economic reasons and to take advantage of our superior public benefits.  The adverse consequences of massive, uncontrolled illegal immigration upon our society are well documented.  For more information about these impacts I refer readers to the Center for Immigration Studies, NumbersUSA, and the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
 
Ms. Saxton accuses me of “demonizing” illegal aliens based on my recent experience of having knife wielding Latino gang members try to break into my house, and attempts to counter my arguments for terminating the City’s Sanctuary Law by citing “other realities”. 
 
Some additional “realities” for Ms.Saxton and the Takoma community to consider in this debate are the fact that in recent months a woman was raped on the Sligo Creek Trail near Maple Ave. by an illegal alien, an 11-year-old girl was gang-raped by illegal aliens on Carroll Ave. just outside City limits, and a 16-year-old girl was gang-raped in Alexandria by three illegal alien members of the notorious MS-13 gang.  In the past two years illegal aliens have murdered over a dozen law-abiding American citizens in the Metro area.  Perhaps the most shocking of these crimes was the daylight murder of 14-year-old Tai Lam on a Ride-On bus by Takoma Park resident and illegal alien MS-13 member, Hector Mauricio Hernandez.
 
Illegal aliens are murdering and raping our children and running amok though our streets in the middle of the day wielding knives and baseball bats and trying to break into our homes.  The suggestion by Ms. Saxton and others who support the City’s Sanctuary Law that these heinous crimes are the price we must all pay for the privilege of accommodating a population that has no moral or legal right to be in this country, is preposterous.  Not one of these despicable crimes should be tolerated, and all were preventable by precluding the presence of these violent individuals in our community in the first place, through strict enforcement of existing immigration laws by all levels of government. 
 
Takoma Park’s Sanctuary Law precludes such enforcement by prohibiting our law enforcement officers from inquiring about the residency status of suspects or contacting immigration officials to check on a suspect’s residency status and whether any criminal warrants are outstanding.  As a result, violent illegal aliens who may be detained by our police are often returned to our streets instead of being removed from our society and deported. 
 
The Sanctuary Law is in direct violation of Federal Law (United States Code, Title 8, Section 1373) which clearly states, in part — “Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government or entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.”
 
Regular readers of the Takoma Voice are aware that I’ve written many times in the past calling for the revocation of the City’s Sanctuary Law.  How many more rapes and murders is it going to take before the City Council takes action and revokes this illegal, obsolete, and dangerous law?
 
Jack
Member: HelpSaveMaryland
Takoma Park
 
 
A New Baby Boom? Foreign ‘Birth Tourists’ Seek U.S. Citizenship for Children
More Foreign Mothers Live Abroad to Give Birth on U.S. Soil, Debate Over 14th Amendment

 
By DEVIN DWYER
April 14, 2010-

Millions of foreign tourists visit the United States every year, and a growing number return home with a brand new U.S. citizen in tow.

Thousands of legal immigrants, who do not permanently reside in the United States but give birth here, have given their children the gift of citizenship, which the U.S. grants to anyone born on its soil.

The number of U.S. births to non-resident mothers rose 53 percent between 2000 and 2006, according to the most recent data from the National Center for Health Statistics. Total births rose 5 percent in the same period.

Among the foreigners who have given birth here, including international travelers passing through and foreign students studying at U.S. universities, are “birth tourists,” women who travel to the United States with the explicit purpose of obtaining citizenship for their child.

Catering to the women is a nascent industry of travel agencies and hotel chains seeking to profit from the business.
The Marmara Manhattan, a Turkish-owned luxury hotel on New York’s City Upper East Side, markets birth tourism packages to expectant mothers abroad, luring more than a dozen pregnant guests and their families to the United States to give birth last year alone.

“What we offer is simply a one-bedroom suite accommodation for $7,750, plus taxes, for a month, with airport transfer, baby cradle and a gift set for the mother,” Marmara Hotel spokeswoman Alexandra Ballantine said.
The hotel estimates the total cost of the package at $45,000.

Most women stay for two months, Ballantine said, and they make medical arrangements on their own. “Guests arrange and pay for these by themselves,” she said of hospital costs that can approach $30,000.

For those with the means to pay, it’s a small price to give a child the full benefits of U.S. citizenship, including the ability to travel freely to and from the United States, easy access to a U.S. education and a chance to start a life here.

“We found a company on the Internet and decided to go to Austin [Texas] for our child’s birth,” Turkish mother Selin Burcuoglu told Istanbul’s Hurriyet Daily News. “I don’t want [my daughter] to deal with visa issues. American citizenship has so many advantages.”

The greatest of those advantages may be the ability of the citizen child to later sponsor the legal immigration of his or her entire family permanently to this country, experts say.
The “birth tourism” industry, which is difficult to track and remains largely anecdotal, has been on the rise for years, according to government and participants reports.

‘Birth Tourism’ on the Rise?

Of the 4,273,225 live births in the United States in 2006, the most recent data gathered by the National Center for Health Statistics, 7,670 were children born to mothers who said they do not live here.

Many, but not all, of those mothers could be “birth tourists,” experts say, although it is difficult to know for sure. The government does not track the reasons non-resident mothers are in the United States at the time of the birth or their citizenship, meaning births to illegal immigrants who live in the United States are counted in the overall total.

In recent years, many women have come from Mexico, South Korea, China and Taiwan, but the trend now extends to countries in Eastern Europe, such as Turkey, where as many as 12,000 children were born in the United States to Turkish parents since 2003 by one estimate.

The business of birth tourism is perfectly legal as long as immigrants are able to pay their own way.

The State Department and Department of Homeland Security have no specific regulations banning pregnant foreigners from entering the United States. But officials say they can and do turn away pregnant women with obvious designs on coming to the United States to take advantage of free medical care.

“When determining if an individual will be allowed to enter the U.S., Customs and Border Protection officers take into consideration the date the child is due for delivery and the length of time the individual intends to stay in the U.S.,” a Department of Homeland Security spokesman said.

Still, critics say the practice largely goes unchecked and exploits the true meaning of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, enacted after the Civil War to grant citizenship to descendants of slaves.
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside,” the amendment reads.

“It’s really an incorrect interpretation of the 14th Amendment,” said Jerome Corsi, a conservative author and columnist who has studied the issue of birth tourism. “Birthright citizenship is a loophole & [and] as it expands into a business for entrepreneurs in foreign countries who offer birth tourism packages, it markets the loophole to attract additional mothers to the U.S.”

Lino Graglia of the University of Texas law school wrote in the Jan. 11 Texas Review of Law & Politics that the authors of the 14th Amendment never would have imagined their words bestowing citizenship to illegal or visiting immigrants.

“It is difficult to imagine a more irrational and self-defeating legal system than one which makes unauthorized entry into this country a criminal offense and simultaneously provides perhaps the greatest possible inducement to illegal entry,” Graglia wrote of birthright citizenship.

Closing the ‘Birth Tourism’ Loophole

The Supreme Court has only addressed the issue once, ruling in 1898 that citizenship applies to U.S.-born children of legal immigrants who have yet to become citizens.

Some legislators, including U.S. Rep. Gary Miller, R-Calif., have called for revising the Constitution to forbid citizenship by birth alone and thereby end the attraction of birth tourists. But other politicos, from both sides of the aisle, say such an approach is politically unrealistic, not to mention unnecessary.

“You just turn people down for being pregnant,” said Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies. “That should be the default position and then there’d have to be some very good reason for an exception.”

Krikorian acknowledged that some people might find a ban on pregnant visitors “outrageous,” but questions the rationality of the alternative.
“Do you really think that’s right that somebody here visiting Disneyland should have their children be U.S. citizens, which they’ll then inevitably use to get access to the U.S.?” he asked.

Krikorian and others call the offspring of birth tourists “anchor babies,” because they can serve as a foothold for future legal immigration of an entire family.
Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said he sees the debate about birth tourists in a different light, however, noting that arguments about citizenship of children ignore a fundamental question of humanity.

“If we’re a country that cares about families and family values, then why are we blaming the children for a decision the parents made. Their only decision was to take a first breath,” he said.

“What is the State Department going to do? To fill out a visa application have a woman pee on a stick?”

The United States is one of the few remaining countries to grant citizenship to all children born on its soil. The United Kingdom, Ireland, India and Australia, among others, have since revised their birthright laws, no longer allowing every child born on their soil to get citizenship.

Copyright © 2010 ABC News Internet Ventures

 

www.HelpSaveMaryland.com

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: