Archive for January 23rd, 2010

A Little Posting on my Ancestory and Father to Cecil Calvert and this is why I fight for Our State

George Calvert 1st Baron Baltimore of Baltimore

(born 1578/79, Kipling, Yorkshire, Eng. — died April 15, 1632) English colonialist. He served in the House of Commons from 1621; charged with communicating the policy of James I, he was distrusted by Parliament. After declaring himself a Roman Catholic (1625), he gave up his office and was created Baron Baltimore, receiving land grants in Ireland. To assure the prosperity of his New World holdings, he took his family to his Newfoundland colony in 1628. Because of conflict over his Catholicism and the severe climate, he petitioned Charles I for a land grant in the Chesapeake Bay area. He died before the charter was granted, and his son Cecil became proprietor of the colony of Maryland.

For more information on George Calvert 1st Baron Baltimore of Baltimore, visitBritannica.com.

The English statesman George Calvert 1st Baron Baltimore (ca. 1580-1632), was the founder of the colony of Maryland in America.

George Calvert was born in Yorkshire about 1580, the son of Leonard and Alice Crossland Calvert. He matriculated at Oxford in 1594 at the age of 14, graduating in 1597. Later, he became secretary to Robert Cecil, a leading figure in the English government. With Cecil’s support and encouragement from the King, Calvert advanced rapidly, attaining a seat in Parliament, membership on the Privy Council, and the position of secretary of state. Prominent public service, however, brought difficult responsibilities. He was obliged to defend in Parliament the unpopular Continental diplomacy of James I, especially the rapprochement with Catholic Spain. His active part in examining Irish grievances led to knighthood in 1617. Following his conversion to Catholicism, Calvert resigned as secretary of state. As a reward for his service, James I gave him the Irish title of Baron Baltimore.

Calvert’s interest in America was of long standing. He had held stock in the Virginia Company and was a member of the Council for New England. In 1623 Calvert obtained a royal charter to found a private colony in Newfoundland. He received the powers of a “Bishop of Durham,” a medieval authority, which meant that the proprietor could exercise feudal control over the land, award titles of nobility, and dominate the government of any colony he established. Known as Avalon, the new colony received Lord Baltimore’s firm support. He visited it in 1627 and later returned with his second wife and children, leaving in England only his eldest son Cecilius. Because of the bitter arctic cold and French attacks, the colony proved a failure. Without giving up his proprietary hopes, Baltimore looked southward, arriving in Jamestown, Va., in 1629. However, his religion and interest in a proprietary colony antagonized the Virginians, who forced Baltimore to return to England. There he prevailed on Charles I to grant him another colony north of the Potomac River, with proprietary features similar to Avalon. Shortly before the charter gained final approval in 1632, Calvert died at the age of 52. The grant was completed in the name of his heir, Cecilius, who proceeded with the colonization of Maryland.

Lord Baltimore’s activities in America indicate the profound impact which the New World had made in England. Some of the most influential men in the mother country were directly involved in western expansion. Moreover, the proprietary grants which Baltimore sought reveal that an interest in establishing feudal estates in America provided important motivation for colonization.

How I Plan to Campaign…..Delegate Christopher B. Shank and accusations placed on him

From Delegate Shank’s Facebook Page:

Someone asked me today in the wake of the front page above the fold story about Don Munson’s campaign manager’s inopportune remarks whether I or anyone in my campaign had anything to do with the newspaper article. I most certainly did not. Many conspiracy theorists, and those who apparently don’t like me very much, accused me of dropping the dime on Mr. Miner in the comments section in the Herald Mail as well.

Accordingly, I’m very pleased that the Herald Mail has taken the step of updating its website to include a 2005 article written by Tiffany Arnold about this issue. They had this issue all along because they reported on it back in 2005!

http://www.herald-mail.com/?cmd=displaystory&story_id=123131&format=html


If you Need any Further Proof that Delegate Chris Shank is whats best for Washington County Compare his Voting Record to Munsons

Please take time and look your legislators and see how they voted on particular bills, such as Speed Cameras, etc.

Delegate Chris Shank scores 100 percent for Liberty, Senator Don “the liberal” Munson 80 percent.

Anything over 80 percent and you are for True Liberty of the People.  Obviously, Don Munson did not meet the Criteria.

http://libertyscorecard.blogspot.com/2010/01/see-how-your-legislator-voted.html

A picture says a Thousand Words, Grumpy Munson, Smiling Shank.

If you REALLY want proof… See More…I have done the monologue Accountability Project for two years (covering each session since 2007) and I grade the General Assembly on a much larger number of votes – usually 20 to 30 per regular session.

Delegate Shank had a rating of 78.02 in 2009 (12th among Delegates) and for this term overall his rating is 83.98 (5th overall among Delegates).

Conversely, Senator Munson had a 54.78 rating in 2009 (14th among Senators) and 56.87 for the term (13th among Senators). Remember, there are only 14 GOP Senators and they naturally occupy the top 14 spots since I rate from a conservative/libertarian limited government, pro-freedom, fiscally sound viewpoint. http://monoblogue.us/2009-maryland-general-assembly-voting/

House Minority Whip

Slots panel : Md. should consider adding table games – Member says state is ‘behind the curve’

Let’s see, I have only been lobbying for this for the last 3 years, that Slots would have no business here under the current referendum on the books and with other states around us approving Table Games, IE., we should have just by passed by that stupid Vote for Slots from the People, who did not even bother to read the Referendum before voting for it and if the GA had balls, would have gone right to Table Games, but no, not with Mike Busch shooting down every gaming bill across his table.  Let us not forget what our Illustrious Governor stated, “I will not fund education through Slots as it will Morally Bankrupt Maryland”, his quote as then Baltimore Mayor.

Members of Maryland’s slots panel, worried that neighboring states are enhancing their casinos, recommended Friday that lawmakers allow table games like blackjack and poker at the five slots locations voters have approved.

“It is apparent we are well behind the curve,” said Commissioner D. Bruce Poole at a slots commission meeting Friday. “We are running catch-up with other states.”

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/legislature/bal-slots-panel0122,0,901737.story

Budget talk can be confusing: How big is it?

Budget talk can be confusing: How big is it?

http://www.marylandreporter.com/page550572.aspx

Sheriff Jenkins and IRLI request Dismissal of Case against him – Santos v. Jenkins – Casa De Maryland Again at Work

Again, I would like to thank Senator Donald “The Liberal” Munson from Washington County for supporting the vote to give Casa De Maryland our Tax Dollars.  Look at what his vote and the other Delegates of the Demigods have created who voted to give them our TAX DOLLARS.

FAIR in Your Community

IRLI Hard at Work in State and Local Enforcement: IRLI(Immigration Reform Law Institute):

In Estrada v. Rhode Island, with the ACLU as opposing counsel, IRLI represented the National Fraternal Order of Police, and submitted briefs to clarify the steps law enforcement officers can take to lawfully identify and detain illegal aliens encountered during routine police patrols. The briefs describe the steps needed to develop reasonable suspicion of violations of the criminal provisions of federal alien registration and other immigration laws, and probable cause to arrest and transfer aliens into ICE custody. At oral argument in Boston on November 8, 2009, members of the three-judge federal appellate panel were clearly familiar with IRLI’s position, a strong indication of the influence of IRLI’s past work and experience. An appellate decision is pending in this case.

In Mendez v. Bradshaw, IRLI represented the Florida Sheriff’s Association to present a clarification of the process and legality of local detention of illegal aliens pursuant to ICE “detainers,”

Building on these two cases, IRLI was retained in late December 2009 by the Frederick County MD Sheriff, as co-counsel in the defense of the Department against a civil rights action brought by an illegal alien, represented by the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund (PRLDEF) and CASA de Maryland. In Santos v. Jenkins, the illegal alien’s backers want a federal court to hold that sheriffs cannot enforce civil restrictions on illegal aliens. IRLI filed an extensive memorandum in support of a motion to dismiss the case, stressing the inherent immigration enforcement authority of local police, on January 19, 2010. Stay tuned in the next few weeks for updates about this important case.

http://www.fairus.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=22227&news_iv_ctrl=2122#1

Casa De Marylands Vision Statement - Regardless of Immigration Status

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.